After I started getting into digital marketing a couple of years ago, I kept hearing the word platform being thrown around a lot. It was used like this:
Businesses need to build a platform to get their message out.
Writers should build a platform if they want to get noticed by publishers.
A large enough platform helps bloggers land book deals.
The number of ways it was used went on and on, but quite frankly, it annoyed me. I was sick of hearing people talking about platform this and platform that.
As a marketer, I cared more about sales and conversions. I cared about how many visitors turned into customers, not how many turned into Twitter followers.
I felt like Allen Iverson in his famous rant about practice (in case you've never seen it, a video is embedded at the end of this post). My rant would have gone something like this:
Platform? Why are we talking about platform? I don't want to talk about platform, I want to talk about sales. Lets talk about conversions and revenue. Why is everyone talking about platform? Come on man, are we still talking about platform?
I'm sure you get the idea. I didn't understand why people were talking about platform so much, and it didn't fit into my traditional marketing background. So what changed?
The aha! moment occurred as I was working on a project to promote a video. The main way to do this was through an e-mail list and Facebook, Twitter, and Google+ accounts for the organization. The success of the video depended largely on the 32,000 or so people on these lists.
As we started promoting the video, I realized that we would only reach so many people with our lists. 32,000 seems like a lot, but when you consider that not everyone on Facebook and Twitter sees every announcement, you don't reach as many people as you might think.
You also realize that if the lists were bigger by the time the video was promoted, then more people could be reached, and the video would receive more views. But this is determined by the size of the platform that has been developed before promoting, not after. If we wanted to promote beyond these lists, we would have to pay to get access to other peoples audiences, a.k.a. spend money on advertising.
At this point, I started realizing why having a platform matters so much. A platform is like a built-in, non-sleezy promotion channel that you own. Its a group of people who are interested in hearing what you have to say and are willing to even promote your ideas and messages for you.
So how does this relate to an overall digital marketing strategy?
For many businesses, building a platform constitutes a large percentage of digital marketing activity. Have you ever wondered what the point of being on Facebook, Twitter, and Google+ is? Have you ever wondered why your writing a blog and accumulating e-mail subscribers?
A big part of the reason is that you're building a platform that you can communicate future ideas with. Once you have these ideas, you want to have the largest platform possible to communicate these ideas to.
Lets take writer Jeff Goins as an example. He's been blogging and writing for several years now. Over that time, he built up a platform of 10,000+ subscribers who are interested in what he has to say. They read and share his posts and support all of the other things that he does.
Several months ago, a publisher approached him about writing a book. Why? Because he had a built in group of people who paid attention to his ideas. In a way, they were interested in the built-in marketing that his platform provided.
So now that Jeff's book Wrecked is out, he's gone from a blogger to a writer to an author in a matter of months. All because of the platform that he spent time to build.
So I'm not sure exactly how much time should be spent on platform building, but one equation looks like this: 99% of time is spent on building the platform and 1% is spent on promoting important ideas and products.
Is this crazy? Should individuals and businesses really spend 99% of their time platform building and 1% of their time promoting important products? Yes and no.
Yes because some businesses should spend this much time building their platform. 99% of their time is used taking care of their audience of interested people and giving them content they want for free. Then, once that big idea or product comes along, companies dip into the 1% to promote their product or idea. But most of the time is spent on platform building.
The answer could also be no because for some businesses the equation should be 90/10 or 80/20. It depends on the business, and every organization has to figure out what the right ratio is for them.
But what I do know is that platform building explains to me why social media marketing is not a waste of time. If you're not building a platform, then I'm not sure what the point of increasing followers is. But if you are building a platform, then it gives meaning to that 99% of time wasted or invested into social media. As far as I can tell, its the whole reason to be on social media and to care about how many people are keeping up with you.
What are your thoughts? Is platform building important for individuals and businesses who want to get the word out about their products and services, or do you think its overrated? And what's your take on the top reasons to be on social media? Leave a comment and well talk about it.
p.s. Here's the previously mentioned Iverson video as promised. Enjoy!
Photo credit: dobrych